SciPost Submission Page
Functional renormalization group for non-Hermitian and $\mathcal{PT}$-symmetric systems
by Lukas Grunwald, Volker Meden, Dante M. Kennes
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Lukas Grunwald |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.08108v2 (pdf) |
| Date accepted: | May 19, 2022 |
| Date submitted: | May 5, 2022, 9:48 a.m. |
| Submitted by: | Grunwald, Lukas |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
| Approach: | Theoretical |
Abstract
We generalize the vertex expansion approach of the functional renormalization group to non-Hermitian systems. As certain anomalous expectation values might not vanish, additional terms as compared to the Hermitian case can appear in the flow equations. We investigate the merits and shortcomings of the vertex expansion for non-Hermitian systems by considering an exactly solvable $\mathcal{PT}$-symmetric non-linear toy-model and reveal, that in this model, the fidelity of the vertex expansion in a perturbatively motivated truncation schema is comparable with that of the Hermitian case. The vertex expansion appears to be a viable method for studying correlation effects in non-Hermitian systems.
Author comments upon resubmission
List of changes
Comments from referee 1:
- Added clarification, that we assume non degenerate eigenvalues only for notational convenience
Comments from referee 2:
- Added footnote clarifying the connection between our approach and the one used by Schütz and Kopietz ( J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 8205)
- Added remark outlining our reasoning for the cutoff choice as well as a reference to the "principle of minimal sensitivity"
- Removed second definition of the Hamiltonian
Comments from referee 3:
- Added footnote explaining sign convention in $(j,\phi)$
- Added a footnote pointing out that the $^\star$ in $\phi^\star$ is part of the symbol and not a complex conjugation
- Changed notation in definition of Greens and Vertex functions for better clarity
- Added footnote explaining why using a numerical analytic continuation will not allow an accurate approximation of the full spectrum
- Added a comment in the caption of Fig.4 for a more precise definition of $\Delta Q$
Additionally we corrected typos in the new version of the manuscript.
Published as SciPost Phys. 12, 179 (2022)
Reports on this Submission
Report #3 by Anonymous (Referee 3) on 2022-5-13 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:2203.08108v2, delivered 2022-05-13, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.5073
Report
Report
manuscript in the present form in SciPost.
Author: Lukas Grunwald on 2022-05-19 [id 2497]
(in reply to Report 3 on 2022-05-13)Dear Referee,
thank you very much for your comment.
Pade-extrapolations are very sensitive to the details of the $\omega$-grid as well as numerical/statistical noise, leading to inaccuracies in the final result (we previously tested the Pade-extrapolations for the anharmonic oscillator in the context of Ref. [26]). Since higher order excitations only have a very small weight in the Greens function (previous argument), a reliable extraction of excitation energies will not be possible with this approach, due to the inaccuracies of the extrapolation.
We hope this further clarifies our argument given in the paper.
Kind regards,
Lukas Grunwald, Volker Meden, Dante Kennes