SciPost Submission Page
On irregularities in the cosmic ray spectrum of $10^{16}-10^{18}$ eV range
by Stanislav Knurenko, Igor Petrov
This is not the latest submitted version.
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Igor Petrov |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.00597v2 (pdf) |
| Date submitted: | 2022-08-05 02:50 |
| Submitted by: | Petrov, Igor |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics Proceedings |
| Proceedings issue: | 21st International Symposium on Very High Energy Cosmic Ray Interactions (ISVHECRI2022) |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
| Approaches: | Experimental, Observational |
Abstract
Small, medium and large arrays for the study of cosmic rays of ultra-high energies existing are aimed at obtaining information about our Galaxy and metagalactic space. Concretely search and study of astronomical objects, that forms flux of relativistic particles that fill outer space. The drift and interaction of such particles with magnetic field and shock waves taking place in interstellar space causes the same interest. The shape of the energy spectrum of cosmic rays in the energy range $10^{15}-10^{18}$ eV, where "knee" and "second knee" is observed, can be formed as a superposition of the partial spectra of various chemical elements. Verification of galactic models, using recent experimental spectral data, makes it possible to study the nature of the galactic and metagalactic components of cosmic rays. The paper presents the result of the energy spectrum of cosmic rays in the range $10^{16}-10^{18}$ eV measurements obtained at the Small Cherenkov array -- a part of the Yakutsk array.
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Report
The article should be accepted, but the wording needs to be improved. I added many suggestions to the text. In addition, it should be a read again carefully by a native speaker if possible.
I added the comments as PDF annotations and I am uploading the annotated PDF. I saw that this is not encouraged, but this is the easiest way of commenting for both the reviewer and the reviewee.