SciPost Submission Page
Systematic Analysis of Crystalline Phases in Bosonic Lattice Models with Algebraically Decaying DensityDensity Interactions
by J. A. Koziol, A. Duft, G. Morigi, K. P. Schmidt
This is not the latest submitted version.
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
Authors (as registered SciPost users):  Antonia Duft · Jan Alexander Koziol · Kai Phillip Schmidt 
Submission information  

Preprint Link:  https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.02091v1 (pdf) 
Date submitted:  20221206 11:04 
Submitted by:  Koziol, Jan Alexander 
Submitted to:  SciPost Physics 
Ontological classification  

Academic field:  Physics 
Specialties: 

Approaches:  Theoretical, Computational 
Abstract
We propose a general approach to analyse diagonal ordering patterns in bosonic lattice models with algebraically decaying densitydensity interactions on arbitrary lattices. The key idea is a systematic search for the energetically best order on all unit cells of the lattice up to a given extent. Using resummed couplings we evaluate the energy of the ordering patterns in the thermodynamic limit using finite unit cells. We apply the proposed approach to the atomic limit of the extended BoseHubbard model on the triangular lattice at fillings $f=1/2$ and $f=1$. We investigate the groundstate properties of the antiferromagnetic longrange Ising model on the triangular lattice and determine a sixfold degenerate plainstripe phase to be the ground state for finite decay exponents. We also probe the classical limit of the FendleySenguptaSachdev model describing Rydberg atom arrays. We focus on arrangements where the atoms are placed on the sites or links of the Kagome lattice.
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Anonymous Report 3 on 202326 (Invited Report)
 Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:2212.02091v1, delivered 20230206, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.6691
Strengths
1. The work is experimentally relevant, theoretically sound, and the manuscript is also wellwritten and straightforward to follow.
2. I personally believe that these results, even though classical, would be extremely useful to the ultracoldatoms community because the solid densitywaveordered states may be regarded as starting points both to benchmark experiments and to incorporate quantum corrections.
3. Moreover, there are often subtle effects from the longranged dipolar ($1/r^3$) or van der Waals ($1/r^6$) interactions, which are hard to quantify in simple meanfield calculations, and the careful analysis outlined in this paper bridges this gap.
Weaknesses
Please refer to the attached PDF.
Report
I would recommend publication in SciPost Physics after some revisions (listed in the report).
Requested changes
Please refer to the attached PDF.
Anonymous Report 2 on 2023131 (Invited Report)
 Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:2212.02091v1, delivered 20230131, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.6644
Strengths
1 This paper provides a systematic algorithm to determine the charge order for lattice classical models with powerlaw density interactions.
2 Such an analysis provides a good starting point to consider quantum effects (i.e. offdiagonal terms in the Fock basis)
Weaknesses
1 It is limited to weak longrange interactions.
2 There is no study of any quantum case although several such models are mentioned.
Report
I find the paper particularly pedagogical and well written. It is nice to see a systematic method to tackle classical models and find the lowest energy pattern. In fact, it is a bit surprising that such a method has not been proposed before ?
Regarding the motivations, there are several quantum models (and references about them), but in its current form, the paper only consider the classical limit. This would be much more interesting if some precise connections could be made to quantum models.
Requested changes
1 I would suggest to remove lots of quantumness from the abstract and the body of the paper. Indeed, the quantum statistics plays no role in the current study, so that it would apply equivalently to bosons, fermions or classical objects.
2 Is it possible to consider, at least partly, the longrange case as done when using Ewald summation ?
3 I would suggest to remove most references about quantum experiments, quantum phases (superfluids, super solids) which are not relevant to the present study.
Author: Jan Alexander Koziol on 20230310 [id 3467]
(in reply to Report 2 on 20230131)
Response: Anonymous Report 2 on 20230131 (Invited)
We thank the referee for examining our work and the suggestions to improve our paper. We acknowledge the idea of the referee to streamline our paper by removing the discussions about the quantum aspects of the models. Nevertheless, we hope to convince the referee why we would like to keep them as part of our work.
Below we address the points made by the referee:
1.) We thank the referee for this point. We see the argument of the referee that "quantum statistics plays no role in the current study", as the examples chosen consider only the "classical limit" with no offdiagonal terms. But, as we discussed in the description of our method and the outlook of the paper, a straightforward application to meanfield considerations with kinetic terms is possible. We are also convinced that our method will largely benefit the studies of trapped ultracold longrange interacting atomic gases, therefore we would like to keep all the references to the publications in the field. We are convinced of the validity of this proceeding and ensured by the responses of the reports 1 and 3. Additionally we added a perturbative discussion of the leading order offdiagonal effects to Sec 5.2.
2.) We thank the referee for this point. As discussed in our paper, it is relevant for the proposed procedure in the paper that the series leading to the resummed couplings is converging. This makes it, with the chosen definition of longrange interactions, not suitable for strong longrange interactions as in that case the series would not converge. In the case that the series is converging it is, of course, not mandatory to perform the resummation in the same way we do in our approach. In some cases, for example on a onedimensional chain, there are even closed forms for the resummed couplings which go back to the mathematical discipline of analytic number theory. We choose the described procedure as within the decay exponents of interest alpha=3,6,10 this simple real space summation is quite capable and the errors are controlled. When going to smaller alpha values than three (especially alpha<=2.5), indeed, a more sophisticated resummation scheme will become necessary to treat the tail of the interaction properly. We added a note to the end of Sec. 2.2 elaborating on the limits and the necessity for a potential improvement of our resummation scheme for alpha<=2.5.
3.) We thank the referee for this point. As already discussed in the response to point 1.) raised by the referee, we see a high value of our method to the community of longrange interacting quantum systems. This is also nicely elaborated on by the referee of report 3. We want to stress that the occuring crystalline phases are directly relevant also for the full quantum models as they are gapped phases and, therefore, stable against quantum fluctuations. We added a discussion of the leading perturbative behaviour to Sec. 5.2. In a similar fashion we would argue that occuring supersolid phases often break the translational symmetry in a similar way as occuring solid phases. Therefore, we would see our considerations also relevant for this issue. Concluding our response to this point: We hope to convince the referee that we would like to keep all the references to the publications in the field.
Anonymous Report 1 on 20221230 (Invited Report)
 Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:2212.02091v1, delivered 20221230, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.6407
Strengths
1. The authors provide a computational mechanism to identify ground states of quantum systems with longrange potentials in the classical limit where the offdiagonal terms in the computational basis (for example Fock basis in real space) is ignored.
2. The states found using this method could be a good starting point for addressing effect of quantum fluctuations for such systems.
3. The treatment, applied to Rydberg atoms on links of Kagome lattice, finds a somewhat different picture than was found earlier in Ref 97 of the paper. In particular they notice absence of resonatiing plaquettes which may call into question the spin liquid state found earlier. If correct, this is expected to open up further studies in the field.
Weaknesses
1. The authors could have studied effect of the offdiagonal terms on their analysis (perturbatively and numerically) rather than leaving this for a future study. That would have provided a more complete picture.
Report
Overall, the authors provide a computational scheme which may be used to numerically evaluate the ground state configuration of a quantum system with longrange densitydensity or spinspin interaction in the classical limit. This method is interesting and may be useful for accurate determination of ground states of such systems. However, they have not estimated the effect of offdiagonal terms ( which are almost always present and important) on their analysis. If this issue can be taken care of (even perturbatively and numerically
for, say, the rydberg atoms on Kagome), the paper shall be much stronger and I would certainly recommend it for publication.
Requested changes
1. It would be nice to have a perturbative and numerical treatment of offdiagonal terms. If this is really impossible, a discussion regarding why that is the case should be included. This is particularly improtant for the Rydberg atoms array on Kagome lattice links.
Author: Jan Alexander Koziol on 20230310 [id 3468]
(in reply to Report 1 on 20221230)
Response: Anonymous Report 1 on 20221230 (Invited)
We thank the referee for examining our work and his suggestions to make the content of our paper stronger.
Below we address the point made by the referee:
1.) We thank the referee for this point. We added a quantitative value for the energy gap between the pinwheel state and the state we find by our consideration in Sec. 5.2. We also added a quantitive value for the leading order corrections in \Omega by which the stability of the newly obtained state against the pinwheel state can be estimated. We added comments on why the evaluation of the fourth and sixth order is impractical or even impossible in the thermodynamic limit. Regarding an unbiased numerical treatment: It seems impossible to us to set up exact diagonalisation calculations due to the large extent of the unit cells of the competing orders. It seems also challenging to perform quantum Monte Carlo simulations. Although a very capable algorithm for the transversefield longrange Ising model by A. Sandvik (https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.68.056701) is known, the parameters of interest lie in the regime of small transverse fields (\Omega) in which the algorithm suffers of a severe performance loss due to long autocorrelation times. Also, the presence of the competing antiferromagnetic interactions makes the Monte Carlo sampling less efficient. Lastly, the treatment using tensor network methods of the regime would be a possibility. As we are not very familiar with this type of methods we cannot comment on the possibility, challenges and limitations of applying them.
Author: Jan Alexander Koziol on 20230310 [id 3466]
(in reply to Report 3 on 20230206)Response: Anonymous Report 3 on 20230206 (Invited)
We thank the referee for thoroughly examining our work and raising several interesting points.
Below we address the points made by the referee:
a) We thank the referee for this point. This is a typographical error which we corrected in Eq. (3), Eq. (4) and Eq.(5).
b) We thank the referee for this point. We added a simple backofthe envelope calculation to determine the rough phase boundaries for the considered fillings f=1/2 and f=1. Additionally, everybody should be able to easily reproduce the phase boundaries as we will publish our resummed couplings (see point g)). Regarding the extent of the defect line phases dependent on their spread $d_s$, we added to the paper the results of a heuristic analysis regarding the accessible phases using our numerical technique. We see the necessity to have an "effective theory" describing the repulsion of the defect lines, but are currently not able to provide a simple picture.
c) We thank the referee for this point. We added an explanation to the text that a phase with n_1 and n_2 occupations is referred to as n_1,n_2Phase.
d) We thank the referee for the point and the additional reference. Indeed, we encounter the devil's staircase when studying systems in a grandcanonical scheme. This issue is discussed in Sec. 5 for the site and link Kagome lattice. With our method, we cannot prove rigorously that there exists a devil's staircase, but within the capabilities (limited by the size of the considered unit cells) of our method we encounter intermediate fractions when taking a closer grid between the more prominent fillings. We added the reference to the discussion in Sec. 5.
e) We thank the referee for this point. We adjusted the layout of the figure accordingly.
f) We thank the referee for this point. We added the energy difference between the pinwheel state and the state we find for the full longrange interaction. We also commented on which interaction is the first to distinguish the two states. This is the fifth nearestneighbour interaction V_5. This is the dominant contribution to the energy gap between the states. Further neighbouring interactions only adjust the energy gap given for the full interaction given in the paper. We also determined the leading order corrections in \Omega to the energy difference between the two states perturbatively.
g) We thank the referee for this point. We agree with the referee that a publication of the code would certainly be a very fruitful step and is our goal for the future. Unfortunately the code is still under development and is not yet ready to publish in its current state. Nevertheless, we will publish the resummed coupling used for our calculations as a data repository on Zenodo. The creation of the resummed couplings is one of the computationally intense part of our numerical evaluation. With this step we hope to encourage people to build on our research and make our results more easily reproducible.