SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Statistical Mechanics of Exponentially Many Low Lying States

by Swapnamay Mondal

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Swapnamay Mondal
Submission information
Preprint Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.12264v2  (pdf)
Date submitted: 2024-07-08 13:06
Submitted by: Mondal, Swapnamay
Submitted to: SciPost Physics
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • High-Energy Physics - Theory
Approach: Theoretical

Abstract

It has recently been argued that for near-extremal black holes, the entropy and the energy above extremality respectively receive a logT and a T-linear correction, where T is the temperature. We show that both these features can be derived in a low but not too low temperature regime, by assuming the existence of exponentially many low lying states cleanly separated from rest of the spectrum, without using any specific theory. Argument of the logarithm in the expression of entropy is seen to be the ratio of temperature and the bandwidth of the low lying states. We argue that such spectrum might arise in non-supersymmetric extremal brane systems. Our findings strengthen Page's suggestion that there is no true degeneracy for non-supersymmetric extremal black holes.

Author indications on fulfilling journal expectations

  • Provide a novel and synergetic link between different research areas.
  • Open a new pathway in an existing or a new research direction, with clear potential for multi-pronged follow-up work
  • Detail a groundbreaking theoretical/experimental/computational discovery
  • Present a breakthrough on a previously-identified and long-standing research stumbling block
Current status:
Awaiting resubmission

Reports on this Submission

Report #3 by Anonymous (Referee 3) on 2024-10-22 (Invited Report)

Strengths

1. well motivated
2. well explained
3. important results
4. detailed numerical analysis

Weaknesses

1. comparison with existing results
2. physical reasoning for temperature cutoff

Report

recommended for publication

Requested changes

1. Physical reasoning for temperature cutoff

Recommendation

Publish (easily meets expectations and criteria for this Journal; among top 50%)

  • validity: high
  • significance: good
  • originality: high
  • clarity: high
  • formatting: excellent
  • grammar: good

Report #2 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2024-10-18 (Contributed Report)

Report

This paper studies the low-temperature corrections to entropy and energy by analyzing the statistical mechanics of low-energy states. These corrections are calculated in the context of a uniform band of low-energy states that are separated from the high-energy states by a large gap.

I recommend the paper for publication after minor changes that are explained below.

(1) Section 3.2 tries to argue that the partition function of a generic spectrum, $Z_{generic}$, is well-approximated by choosing the energy levels to be equally spaced, $Z_{equi-spaced}$.

This is done numerically by comparing $Z_{generic}$ and $Z_{equi-spaced}$. However, the numerical analysis presented in the paper is not sufficient when the temperature is small. The paper chooses $\Delta = 1$ and the plots in Figures 1-5 show $T \in [0,1]$. However, most of the relative error plots showing $(Z_{generic} - Z_{equi-spaced})/Z_{equi-spaced}$ tends to blow up for small $T$. This is problematic because the paper is very interested in the temperature range $T \ll \Delta$. More evidence is needed to show that $Z_{generic} \approx Z_{equi-spaced}$ in this temperature range.

(2) Relatedly, it is not clear why $Z_{generic}$ obtained from taking the energy levels to be independent, uniformly distributed random variables is a good ansatz for the cases under consideration.

For instance, if we assume that the energy levels are given by a matrix model then we expect the density of states to have a square root edge, i.e. $\rho(E) \sim \sqrt{E}.$ Moreover, the energy levels are not independent but they level repel. This does not match with the assumptions for $Z_{generic}$. Some comments on this would be helpful.

(3) In section 3.3, case 2 studies the low but not too low temperatures. Some passing comments are made below equation (3.14) but these should be explained better. It would be helpful if the large system limit is explained better. Also, it is not clear why $T \to 0$ is a valid limit in this case.

Recommendation

Ask for minor revision

  • validity: good
  • significance: ok
  • originality: good
  • clarity: high
  • formatting: good
  • grammar: excellent

Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 2) on 2024-9-18 (Invited Report)

Report

The subject of the paper is well-aligned with the journal's theme. However, before accepting for publication, some changes need to be incorporated. This is mentioned in detail in the report attached.

Attachment


Recommendation

Ask for major revision

  • validity: -
  • significance: -
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Login to report or comment