SciPost Submission Page
Immobile and mobile excitations of three-spin interactions on the diamond chain
by M. Bayer, M. Vieweg, K. P. Schmidt
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Kai Phillip Schmidt · Maximilian Vieweg |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.25349v2 (pdf) |
| Date submitted: | Nov. 23, 2025, 7:27 a.m. |
| Submitted by: | Kai Phillip Schmidt |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics Core |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
Abstract
We present a solvable one-dimensional spin-1/2 model on the diamond chain featuring three-spin interactions, which displays both, mobile excitations driving a second-order phase transition between an ordered and a $\mathbb{Z}_2$-symmetry broken phase, as well as non-trivial fully immobile excitations. The model is motivated by the physics of fracton excitations, which only possess mobility in a reduced dimension compared to the full model. We provide an exact mapping of this model to an arbitrary number of independent transverse-field Ising chain segments with open boundary conditions. The number and lengths of these segments correspond directly to the number of immobile excitations and their respective distances from one another. Furthermore, we demonstrate that multiple immobile excitations exhibit Casimir-like forces between them, resulting in a non-trivial spectrum.
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Report #1 by Jozef Strecka (Referee 1) on 2025-12-23 (Invited Report)
Strengths
2- The derivation of the immobile excitation energy is technically highly nontrivial and constitutes a novel and valuable result.
3- The introduced one-dimensional quantum spin chain captures key ideas of symmetry-protected immobility and Hilbert-space fragmentation that are central to fracton-inspired physics.
Weaknesses
Report
Requested changes
1- Although the manuscript is motivated by fracton physics, the immobile excitations do not exhibit some defining properties of fractons. It would improve clarity of the manuscript if the authors explicitly state in what precise sense the excitations are fracton-like and in what sense they are not genuine fractons.
2- The mapped model corresponds to a transverse-field Ising chain with regularly alternating couplings. There exists relevant earlier literature on such models as for instance O. Derzhko et al., Physical Review B 66, 144401 (2002). The authors should cite and briefly discuss this and related works on the bond alternating transverse Ising chains to better place their results in the context of existing literature.
3- The observed quantum phase transition is found to belong to 2D Ising universality class, while the studied diamond spin chain is one-dimensional and maps to a transverse-field Ising chain. A short clarification that this refers to the 2D classical Ising universality class via the quantum-to-classical mapping would avoid confusion.
4- To bring a deeper insight, it would be valuable to add to the manuscript typical field dependencies of the magnetization and triplet correlation function as conjugated quantities to the field term and three-spin coupling, which would provide a further confirmation of the nature of quantum phase transition.
5- The immobile excitations are defined in terms of symmetry sectors. It would strengthen the physical interpretation if the authors briefly discuss, which local operator(s) create such an excitation and how such excitations could be detected experimentally.
6- There seem to be a few typos in equations as for instance missing brackets after summation symbols in Eqs. (8)-(9), (21) at the effective field terms, in the second and third rows in Eq. (13), and in Eq. (26).
Recommendation
Publish (easily meets expectations and criteria for this Journal; among top 50%)
