SciPost Submission Page
Status of DUNE
by A. Tonazzo for the DUNE Collaboration
This is not the latest submitted version.
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Alessandra Tonazzo |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | scipost_201810_00004v1 (pdf) |
| Date submitted: | 2018-10-29 01:00 |
| Submitted by: | Tonazzo, Alessandra |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics Proceedings |
| Proceedings issue: | The 15th International Workshop on Tau Lepton Physics (TAU2018) |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
| Approach: | Experimental |
Abstract
The Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) is a next-generation underground observatory, to be located in the USA, aiming at precise measure- ment of long-baseline neutrino oscillations over a 1300 km baseline, detection of supernova neutrinos and search for nucleon decay and other physics beyond the Standard Model. The far detector, a very large liquid argon time projec- tion chamber, requires a dedicated prototyping effort (ProtoDUNE), currently ongoing at CERN.
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2018-11-29 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_201810_00004v1, delivered 2018-11-29, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.683
Report
Good and comprehensive report on the status of DUNE. A few language comments have been suggested to the author and waiting for feedback. For reference they are summarised below:
Abstract
aiming at precise measurement -> aiming at precise measurements
Introduction
Both of them require a dedicated -> Bot of them require dedicated
Chapter 2
Comment: You refer to deep-learning based event selection at the end of the first paragraph. Can you be a bit more precise and refer to some example?
Comment: You mention lifetimes of > 10^33. Is this really larger than or smaller then? Do you also have a reference to the mentioned SUSY models?
Chapter 3
- towards the end you mention SiPM. While it’s clear to me what this abbreviation means it might not be clear to everyone. Could you please spell it out once?
Chapter 4
- you use ktonne and kt. Could you change it to a consistent notation?
Chapter 5
- you use standard model and Standard Model. Could you change this to a consistent notation?
- are being tested at CERN -> are tested at CERN
- ready ready -> ready
- physics physics -> physics
- with the mean -> with beam