SciPost Submission Page
Entanglement gap, corners, and symmetry breaking
by Vincenzo Alba
This is not the latest submitted version.
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Vincenzo Alba |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | scipost_202010_00015v1 (pdf) |
| Date submitted: | 2020-10-17 15:53 |
| Submitted by: | Alba, Vincenzo |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics Core |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
| Approach: | Theoretical |
Abstract
We investigate the finite-size scaling of the lowest entanglement gap $\delta\xi$ in the ordered phase of the two-dimensional quantum spherical model (QSM). The entanglement gap decays as $\delta\xi=\Omega/\sqrt{L\ln(L)}$. This is in contrast with the purely logarithmic behaviour as $\delta\xi=\pi^2/\ln(L)$ at the critical point. The faster decay in the ordered phase reflects the presence of magnetic order. We analytically determine the constant $\Omega$, which depends on the low-energy part of the model dispersion and on the geometry of the bipartition. In particular, we are able to compute the corner contribution to $\Omega$, at least for the case of a square corner.
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 3) on 2020-11-23 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_202010_00015v1, delivered 2020-11-23, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.2223
Report
In this paper the author studies the finite-size scaling of the lowest entanglement gap in the ordered phase of the 2D quantum spherical model n a square lattice which is exactly solvable. The main result of the paper is that asymptotically the gap decays as \Omega / \sqrt{L \log L} as opposed to the ~1/sqrt{\log L} scaling at the critical point, and the author also determines the corner contribution to \Omega.
In recent years the study of the entanglement properties in quantum many-body systems has become a central topic. This works provides an interesting and valuable contribution to the field, and builds also an interesting basis for future works. The paper is written in a clear way, and the results have been carefully checked also numerically.
For these reasons I can recommend this paper to be accepted in SciPost Physics. I have only minor comments, listed below, which the author may want to consider when revising the manuscript.
Comments and questions:
1) It would be interesting to extend the discussion why a different scaling behavior was predicted in Ref.[29], in order to better understand the difference with the result in this paper. A brief comment is made around Eq.(48) and in the conclusions, but if there is any more information that could be added here, that would be useful (e.g. based on what approach/assumptions the result in Ref.[29] was obtained).
2) In the conclusions the author mention the importance to understand how the scaling of the entanglement gap depends on dimensionality and the range of interactions. I was wondering if there is "natural" conjecture that could be made here, or if it is completely unknown.
3) Here is a list of minor typos I spotted while reading:
- p3 first line of Sec.2: "cubic lattice" -> "square lattice" (since it is 2D)
- Eq.(9) A point "." is missing
- p4, 4th line after Eq (17): remove either "finite" or "nonzero". Same line: "at _the_ critical point"
- p8, 3d line after Eq (39): "vecto" -> "vector"
- p10, Sec 6, there is an extra new line before "(see Figure 1(a))" which should be removed.
- p14, 3 lines after Eq (57): "These be calculated" -> "These can be calculated"
- please check the arxiv references in the bibliography, especially the links which do not seem to work properly (e.g. [29], [39]).