SciPost Submission Page
Laser spectroscopy of light muonic atoms and the nuclear charge radii
by A. Antognini, F. Kottmann1, R. Pohl
This is not the latest submitted version.
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Aldo Antognini |
Submission information | |
---|---|
Preprint Link: | scipost_202106_00018v1 (pdf) |
Date submitted: | 2021-06-10 13:55 |
Submitted by: | Antognini, Aldo |
Submitted to: | SciPost Physics Proceedings |
Proceedings issue: | Review of Particle Physics at PSI (PSI2020) |
Ontological classification | |
---|---|
Academic field: | Physics |
Specialties: |
|
Approach: | Experimental |
Abstract
The energy levels of hydrogen-like atomic systems are shifted slightly by the complex structure of the nucleus, in particular by the finite size of the nucleus. These energy shifts are vastly magnified in muonic atoms and ions, i.e. the hydrogen-like systems formed by a negative muon and a nucleus. By measuring the 2S-2P energy splitting in muonic hydrogen, muonic deuterium and muonic helium, we have been able to deduce the p, d, 3He and 4He nuclear charge radii to an unprecedented accuracy. These radii provide benchmarks for hadron and nuclear theories, lead to precision tests of bound- state QED in regular atoms and to a better determination of the Rydberg constant.
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Report #2 by Anonymous (Referee 2) on 2021-7-13 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_202106_00018v1, delivered 2021-07-13, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.3229
Report
Laser spectroscopy of light muonic atoms, starting with the pristine muonic hydrogen system and expanding to muonic deuterium and Helium ions has been a scientific highlight of the PSI research program. It allows for precision measurements which are very difficult to match by any other method, as the tightly bound muon probes the electromagnetic structure of the nucleon and light nuclei with a few million times larger overlap than the electrons of ordinary atoms. The surprising disagreement with previous measurements on the proton charge radius, dubbed the proton radius puzzle, caught the interest of the physics community at large, including atomic physics as well as nuclear and particle physics. It stimulated a rich research program both in theoretical developments and a new generation of precision measurements and changed the previously accepted value of the Rydberg Constant. After years of debate a largely consistent picture is emerging with the muonic atom data not only holding up, but defining a new precision standard in this field.
This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the scientific questions, the experimental method, which is based on several remarkable technical achievements, and the impact of the results on various fields of physics. It is formulated well and includes extensive references for more detailed questions. The paper can be published as it, as it clearly exceeds all the required criteria for publication.
Below I add some minor remarks for the author's consideration.
Fig 21.3: In the way the CAD of the cavity is cut, the two sides look the same. So it is hard to comprehend the difference between the cylindrical mirror side and the flat mirror with the ears side. Perhaps this figure could be improved.
Line 147. It would be helpful to state in the preceding paragraph that the Michel electrons are detected by the LAAPDs.
Fig. 21.4: Define the lighter/darker bands and colors early on in the figure caption. Are they consistently used? Carboni is colored in blue, though this was a muonic experiment, Sick in magenta, though probably this was an e-scattering evaluation.
3He measurements are mentioned, but no results presented. Maybe comment on the status of this analysis.
Report #1 by Adrian Signer (Referee 1) on 2021-6-22 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Adrian Signer, Report on arXiv:scipost_202106_00018v1, delivered 2021-06-22, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.3101
Report
We (the editors Cy Hoffman, Klaus Kirch, Adrian Signer) had the
opportunity to review an earlier draft of the article and were in
communication with the authors before the submission. All our comments
and suggestions have been taken into account. Hence, we think the
paper can now be published in the current form.