SciPost Submission Page
Production mechanisms of open heavy flavor mesons in high-multiplicity events
by Marat Siddikov, Ivan Schmidt
This is not the latest submitted version.
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Marat Siddikov |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | scipost_202107_00090v1 (pdf) |
| Date submitted: | 2021-07-30 14:45 |
| Submitted by: | Siddikov, Marat |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics Proceedings |
| Proceedings issue: | 28th Annual Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering (DIS) and Related Subjects (DIS2021) |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
| Approach: | Phenomenological |
Abstract
In this proceeding we discuss different mechanisms of open-heavy flavor meson production which contribute to inclusive and single diffractive cross-sections. For the case of inclusive production we demonstrate that the three-Pomeron fusion is significant for the $D$-meson production in the kinematics of small transverse momenta $p_{T}$, as well as in large-multiplicity events. Its inclusion allows to improve significantly the description of experimental data. We also analyzed the diffractive production and found that due to gap survival factors it constitutes 0.5\textendash 2 per cent of the inclusive production. The expected dependence on event multiplicity in this channel is significantly milder than for inclusive case.
Current status:
Reports on this Submission
Report
General observation:
Fig. 1, assuming the solid line is for 2-pomeron and dashed line for 2 and 3-pomeron as described in the figure, I don't see the improvement at small P_T. The dashed curve clearly over predicts the data. This doesn't support the conclusion.
Minor correction:
Abstract: "per cent" -> "percent"
Author: Marat Siddikov on 2022-02-11 [id 2190]
(in reply to Report 1 on 2022-02-10)
Dear Editor,
We thank the referee for careful reading of our report. Below we send our replies to the referee's comments and the updated version of our manuscript (attached file "Proceeding_DIS2021_Draft_v02.pdf")
Sincerely,
Marat Siddikov
REFEREE:
General observation:
Fig. 1, assuming the solid line is for 2-apomeron and dashed line for 2 and 3-pomeron as described in the figure, I don't see the improvement at small P_T. The dashed curve clearly over predicts the data. This doesn't support the conclusion.
AUTHORS:
In the previous version we had mistakenly set the labels in the left panel of the Figure 1. The dashed line in this plot corresponds to 2-pomeron only contribution, whereas solid line is a sum of 2- and 3-pomeron contributions. The caption of the Figure correctly claims that 3-pomeron contribution is negative, so its inclusion decreases the total result and improves agreement with data (as we can see from the plot, the solid line is closer to the data than the dashed one).
In order to correct this issue, in the resubmitted version we corrected the labels in the left panel of the Figure 1.
REFEREE:
Minor correction:
Abstract: "per cent" -> "percent"
AUTHORS:
We corrected this spelling error in the resubmitted version.
Attachment:
Proceeding_DIS2021_Draft_v02.pdf
Anonymous on 2022-02-11 [id 2192]
(in reply to Marat Siddikov on 2022-02-11 [id 2190])
Thanks for making the revision, and "Yes"! The 3 pameron contribution significantly improve the fitting quality.
Recommend to accept for publication.
Author: Marat Siddikov on 2022-02-11 [id 2191]
(in reply to Report 1 on 2022-02-10)Dear Editor,
We thank the referee for careful reading of our report. Below we send our replies to the referee's comments and the updated version of our manuscript (attached file "Proceeding_DIS2021_v02.pdf")
Sincerely,
Marat Siddikov
REFEREE:
General observation:
Fig. 1, assuming the solid line is for 2-apomeron and dashed line for 2 and 3-pomeron as described in the figure, I don't see the improvement at small P_T. The dashed curve clearly over predicts the data. This doesn't support the conclusion.
AUTHORS:
In the previous version we had mistakenly set the labels in the left panel of the Figure 1. The dashed line in this plot corresponds to 2-pomeron only contribution, whereas solid line is a sum of 2- and 3-pomeron contributions. The caption of the Figure correctly claims that 3-pomeron contribution is negative, so its inclusion decreases the total result and improves agreement with data (as we can see from the plot, the solid line is closer to the data than the dashed one).
In order to correct this issue, in the resubmitted version we corrected the labels in the left panel of the Figure 1.
REFEREE:
Minor correction:
Abstract: "per cent" -> "percent"
AUTHORS:
We corrected this spelling error in the resubmitted version.
Attachment:
Proceeding_DIS2021_v02.pdf