SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Black Hole Mergers in Holographic Space Time Models of Cosmology

by Anish Suresh, Tom Banks

This Submission thread is now published as

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Thomas Banks
Submission information
Preprint Link: scipost_202306_00016v2  (pdf)
Date accepted: 2024-07-09
Date submitted: 2024-05-24 20:20
Submitted by: Banks, Thomas
Submitted to: SciPost Physics Core
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • Gravitation, Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Approaches: Theoretical, Computational

Abstract

We perform a crude computer simulation to show that no problematic black holes are formed by mergers in the early matter dominated phase of the HST models of inflation. These are black holes whose decays could have been seen as signals in the CMB. We also conclude that tiny "black hole galaxies" form. Since black hole decay products are mostly massive standard model particles, and perhaps their superpartners, the fate of these proto-galaxies is a complicated dynamical problem. It suggests the possibility of primordial structures on the order of the horizon size at the beginning of the radiation dominated era. This is about $10^9\ L_P$ in the current model.

Author comments upon resubmission

We have tried to address all of the comments of the referees.

List of changes

Extensive introduction to the principles of Holographic Space Time Models of Inflation. All units changed to natural units. Numerous other changes.

Published as SciPost Phys. Core 7, 057 (2024)


Reports on this Submission

Report #2 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2024-6-28 (Invited Report)

Report

The paper is much better written now, and even though it does not give as self-contained a review of HST as I had asked for, it can be accepted. It is clear enough, and as I said in my previous report, it has some original ideas.

Recommendation

Publish (easily meets expectations and criteria for this Journal; among top 50%)

  • validity: -
  • significance: -
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 2) on 2024-6-22 (Invited Report)

Report

One of the main concern with earlier version was that the paper was not very well written. Current version contains more detailed explanation and also addresses the concerns that were raised .

Recommendation

Publish (easily meets expectations and criteria for this Journal; among top 50%)

  • validity: -
  • significance: -
  • originality: -
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: -

Login to report or comment