SciPost Physics

QCD or what?

Theo Heimel, Gregor Kasieczka, Tilman Plehn, Jennifer M Thompson

SciPost Phys. 6, 030 (2019) · published 8 March 2019

• doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.6.3.030
• pdf
• BiBTeX
• RIS
• Submissions/Reports
• 

Abstract

Autoencoder networks, trained only on QCD jets, can be used to search for anomalies in jet-substructure. We show how, based either on images or on 4-vectors, they identify jets from decays of arbitrary heavy resonances. To control the backgrounds and the underlying systematics we can de-correlate the jet mass using an adversarial network. Such an adversarial autoencoder allows for a general and at the same time easily controllable search for new physics. Ideally, it can be trained and applied to data in the same phase space region, allowing us to efficiently search for new physics using un-supervised learning.

• Komiske et al., Exploring the space of jets with CMS open data
  Phys. Rev. D 101, 034009 (2020) [Crossref]
• Komiske et al., The hidden geometry of particle collisions
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 6 (2020) [Crossref]
• Andreassen et al., Simulation assisted likelihood-free anomaly detection
  Phys. Rev. D 101, 095004 (2020) [Crossref]
• Moreno et al., Interaction networks for the identification of boosted H→bb¯ decays
  Phys. Rev. D 102, 012010 (2020) [Crossref]
• Komiske et al., Metric Space of Collider Events
  Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 041801 (2019) [Crossref]
• Buhmann et al., Getting High: High Fidelity Simulation of High Granularity Calorimeters with High Speed
  Comput Softw Big Sci 5, 13 (2021) [Crossref]
• D’Agnolo et al., Learning multivariate new physics
  Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 89 (2021) [Crossref]
• Cerri et al., Variational autoencoders for new physics mining at the Large Hadron Collider
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2019, 36 (2019) [Crossref]
• Blance et al., Adversarially-trained autoencoders for robust unsupervised new physics searches
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2019, 47 (2019) [Crossref]
• Beauchesne et al., Searching for periodic signals in kinematic distributions using continuous wavelet transforms
  Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 192 (2020) [Crossref]
• Batson et al., Topological obstructions to autoencoding
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 280 (2021) [Crossref]
• Nachman et al., Anomaly detection with density estimation
  Phys. Rev. D 101, 075042 (2020) [Crossref]
• Aad et al., Dijet Resonance Search with Weak Supervision Using s=13  TeV pp Collisions in the ATLAS Detector
  Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 131801 (2020) [Crossref]
• Collins et al., Comparing weak- and unsupervised methods for resonant anomaly detection
  Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 617 (2021) [Crossref]
• Cohen et al., Jet substructure from dark sector showers
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 118 (2020) [Crossref]
• Aguilar-Saavedra et al., Mass Unspecific Supervised Tagging (MUST) for boosted jets
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 12 (2021) [Crossref]
• Amram et al., Tag N’ Train: a technique to train improved classifiers on unlabeled data
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 153 (2021) [Crossref]
• Dillon et al., Uncovering latent jet substructure
  Phys. Rev. D 100, 056002 (2019) [Crossref]
• Farina et al., Searching for new physics with deep autoencoders
  Phys. Rev. D 101, 075021 (2020) [Crossref]
• Larkoski et al., A theory of quark vs. gluon discrimination
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2019, 14 (2019) [Crossref]
• Bradshaw et al., Mass agnostic jet taggers
  SciPost Phys. 8, 011 (2020) [Crossref]
• Dillon et al., Learning the latent structure of collider events
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 206 (2020) [Crossref]
• Aguilar-Saavedra et al., Multiphoton signals of a (96 GeV?) stealth boson
  Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 403 (2020) [Crossref]
• Benkendorfer et al., Simulation-assisted decorrelation for resonant anomaly detection
  Phys. Rev. D 104, 035003 (2021) [Crossref]
• Atkinson et al., Anomaly detection with convolutional Graph Neural Networks
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 80 (2021) [Crossref]
• Krupa et al., GPU coprocessors as a service for deep learning inference in high energy physics
  Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol. 2, 035005 (2021) [Crossref]
• Kasieczka et al., Per-object systematics using deep-learned calibration
  SciPost Phys. 9, 089 (2020) [Crossref]
• Matchev et al., Finding wombling boundaries in LHC data with Voronoi and Delaunay tessellations
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 137 (2020) [Crossref]
• Aguilar-Saavedra et al., Exotic diboson $$Z'$$ decays in the U$$\mu \nu $$SSM
  Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 805 (2021) [Crossref]
• Park et al., Quasi anomalous knowledge: searching for new physics with embedded knowledge
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 30 (2021) [Crossref]
• Aguilar-Saavedra et al., Jet tagging made easy
  Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 530 (2020) [Crossref]
• Finke et al., Autoencoders for unsupervised anomaly detection in high energy physics
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 161 (2021) [Crossref]
• Chakraborty et al., Neural network-based top tagger with two-point energy correlations and geometry of soft emissions
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 111 (2020) [Crossref]
• Murphy, Class imbalance techniques for high energy physics
  SciPost Phys. 7, 076 (2019) [Crossref]
• van Beekveld et al., Combining outlier analysis algorithms to identify new physics at the LHC
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 24 (2021) [Crossref]
• Kasieczka et al., Automating the ABCD method with machine learning
  Phys. Rev. D 103, 035021 (2021) [Crossref]
• Knapen et al., Perturbative benchmark models for a dark shower search program
  Phys. Rev. D 103, 115013 (2021) [Crossref]
• Erdmann et al., Maximum performance of strange-jet tagging at hadron colliders
  J. Inst. 16, P08039 (2021) [Crossref]
• Kasieczka et al., Quark-gluon tagging: Machine learning vs detector
  SciPost Phys. 6, 069 (2019) [Crossref]
• Diefenbacher et al., CapsNets continuing the convolutional quest
  SciPost Phys. 8, 023 (2020) [Crossref]
• Bollweg et al., Deep-learning jets with uncertainties and more
  SciPost Phys. 8, 006 (2020) [Crossref]
• Knapp et al., Adversarially Learned Anomaly Detection on CMS open data: re-discovering the top quark
  Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 236 (2021) [Crossref]
• Datta et al., Automating the construction of jet observables with machine learning
  Phys. Rev. D 100, 095016 (2019) [Crossref]
• Bernreuther et al., Casting a graph net to catch dark showers
  SciPost Phys. 10, 046 (2021) [Crossref]
• Thaprasop et al., Unsupervised outlier detection in heavy-ion collisions
  Phys. Scr. 96, 064003 (2021) [Crossref]
• Aguilar-Saavedra et al., The minimal stealth boson: models and benchmarks
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2019, 237 (2019) [Crossref]
• Dolan et al., Equivariant energy flow networks for jet tagging
  Phys. Rev. D 103, 074022 (2021) [Crossref]
• Larkoski et al., Jet substructure at the Large Hadron Collider: A review of recent advances in theory and machine learning
  Physics Reports 841, 1 (2020) [Crossref]
• Chakraborty et al., Interpretable deep learning for two-prong jet classification with jet spectra
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2019, 135 (2019) [Crossref]
• Mullin et al., Does SUSY have friends? A new approach for LHC event analysis
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 160 (2021) [Crossref]
• Dillon et al., Better latent spaces for better autoencoders
  SciPost Phys. 11, 061 (2021) [Crossref]
• Bhattacherjee et al., Study of energy deposition patterns in hadron calorimeter for prompt and displaced jets using convolutional neural network
  J. High Energ. Phys. 2019, 156 (2019) [Crossref]
• Nachman, A guide for deploying Deep Learning in LHC searches: How to achieve optimality and account for uncertainty
  SciPost Phys. 8, 090 (2020) [Crossref]
• Kasieczka et al., The Machine Learning landscape of top taggers
  SciPost Phys. 7, 014 (2019) [Crossref]
• Abdughani et al., Probing the triple Higgs boson coupling with machine learning at the LHC
  Phys. Rev. D 104, 056003 (2021) [Crossref]