SciPost Submission Page
Evaluation of timedependent correlators after a local quench in iPEPS: hole motion in the tJ model
by C. Hubig, A. Bohrdt, M. Knap, F. Grusdt, J. I. Cirac
This is not the current version.
Submission summary
As Contributors:  Claudius Hubig · Michael Knap 
Arxiv Link:  https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01159v1 (pdf) 
Date submitted:  20191105 01:00 
Submitted by:  Hubig, Claudius 
Submitted to:  SciPost Physics 
Academic field:  Physics 
Specialties: 

Approaches:  Theoretical, Computational 
Abstract
Infinite projected entangled pair states (iPEPS) provide a convenient variational description of infinite, translationallyinvariant twodimensional quantum states. However, the simulation of local excitations is not directly possible due to the translationallyinvariant ansatz. Furthermore, as iPEPS are either identical or orthogonal, expectation values between different states as required during the evaluation of nonequaltime correlators are illdefined. Here, we show that by introducing auxiliary states on each site, it becomes possible to simulate both local excitations and evaluate nonequaltime correlators in an iPEPS setting under realtime evolution. We showcase the method by simulating the tJ model after a single hole has been placed in the halffilled antiferromagnetic background and evaluating both return probabilities and spin correlation functions, as accessible in quantum gas microscopes.
Ontology / Topics
See full Ontology or Topics database.Current status:
Submission & Refereeing History
You are currently on this page
Reports on this Submission
Anonymous Report 3 on 2019123 (Invited Report)
 Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:1911.01159v1, delivered 20191203, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.1360
Report
In this work the authors present a scheme to compute timedependent correlation functions based on infinite projectedentangled pair states (iPEPS). Rather than just applying a local operator to the ansatz and timeevolving the state (which would lead to a loss of translational invariance) the scheme keeps the translational invariance of the ansatz by introducing auxiliary states on each site and an operator acting on both the physical and auxiliary space. The accuracy of the operator representation is depends on a small parameter \epsilon (controlling the density of excitations) which is chosen sufficiently small. They test their approach on the tJ model by computing the return probability and diagonal spin correlators of a single hole doped in the antiferromagnetic background at half filling, and they present comparisons with results obtained with matrix product states on cylinders.
Studying local quenches in 2D is a very challenging and important problem. This work introduces a very interesting and useful trick in this context which I believe will be very useful in future iPEPS simulations. As the authors mention, there is still room for improvement in the time evolution scheme used (i.e. a stable full update evolution rather than the less accurate simple update scheme), but even the present results clearly demonstrate the usefulness and applicability of their approach.
For these reasons I can recommend publication of this article in SciPost. The authors may want to take into account the comments and questions listed below when revising their paper.
Comments and questions
(1) In the results section the authors use an excitation density \epsilon of 10^2, and they mention that ideally one would want to consider the case \epsilon > 0. While I can imagine that most of the error comes from the truncation due to the finite D, it would nevertheless be good to discuss the dependence of the results on epsilon (e.g. showing some example data as a function of epsilon).
(2) It would be interesting to discuss also the dependence on the trotter step used.
(3) Is there any criterion which can be used in order to judge when the approach starts breaking down? For example, can one observe that at after a certain time scale the singular value spectrum (on the bonds in the simple update scheme) becomes very flat, suggesting that the entanglement is too large / the bond dimension D too small?
Report 2 by Didier Poilblanc on 20191120 (Invited Report)
 Cite as: Didier Poilblanc, Report on arXiv:1911.01159v1, delivered 20191120, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.1332
Strengths
Cuttingedge developments by experts in the field of tensor networks
Application of the method to an interesting wellstudied problem
Weaknesses
Part of the old literature on the one hole tJ model is ignored and may be relevant for interpreting the iPEPS results.
Report
The authors introduce a new method to study, in a two dimensional correlated system, the time evolution after a sudden quench by adapting iPEPS techniques. These are clearly cuttingedge developments by experts in the field of tensor networks.
The authors benchmark the method by investigated the dynamics of a single hole in a quantum antiferromagnet  the socalled tJ model  a wellstudied problem in the late 80's  early 90's after the discovery of highTc superconductors. Reliable techniques like Lanczos exact diagonalizations on small torii were used to obtain accurately the hole dispersion relation and to establish the composite nature of the hole excitation and the corresponding stringlike force. These points were developed in early key references like:
E. Dagotto, R. Joynt, A. Moreo, S. Bacci and E. Gagliano, Phys. Rev. B 41, 9049 (1990).
Didier Poilblanc, H. J. Schulz, and Timothy Ziman, Phys. Rev. B 46, 6435 (1992)
Didier Poilblanc, H. J. Schulz, and Timothy Ziman, Phys. Rev. B 47, 3268 (1993)
D. Poilblanc, T. Ziman, H.J. Schulz and E. Dagotto, Phys. Rev. B 47, 14267 (1993).
P.BĂ©ran, D.Poilblanc and R.B.Laughlin, Nuclear Physics B 473, 707720 (1996).
The string picture developed in the above references seems to be an essential ingredient to interpret the return probability computed by the authors.
Requested changes
The authors may consider (and cite) the above reference. They may also comment on whether any evidence for the holonspinon stringlike force is seen in their calculation.
Author: Claudius Hubig on 20200107
(in reply to Report 2 by Didier Poilblanc on 20191120)
We are grateful to the referee for their very positive report and are thankful for the additional references suggested.
Of course we are happy to include those additional references once the editor has fixed their editorial recommendation. The timescales currently available to us do not allow us to compare to the holonspinonstring picture in detail, although our observations so far are at least consistent with it.
Author: Claudius Hubig on 20200107
(in reply to Report 3 on 20191203)We would like to thank the referee for their very positive report and are grateful for their kind comments regarding the applicability and usefulness of our approach.
To reply to their specific questions:
1) We have also tested the simulation with \epsilon of 10^4 and found fundamentally the same behavior, albeit with a stronger dependence of hole mobility on the bond dimension. That is, to observe hole mobility, we needed a larger bond dimension. This is already discussed in our manuscript (on the lower part of page 7), we expect future work to both study this dependence in more detail and ideally also use smaller \epsilon to avoid holehole interactions at longer times.
2) We have found our results not to change if we use a smaller Trotter step size. A larger Trotter step size leads to slightly different results. We expect that if a (fast) full update is used in future work to reduce the truncation error, the Trotter step size gains in relative importance.
3) This is a very interesting remark which we would be happy to explore in future work as well.