SciPost Submission Page
Lessons from the Ramond sector
by Nathan Benjamin, Ying-Hsuan Lin
This Submission thread is now published as
Submission summary
| Authors (as registered SciPost users): | Nathan Benjamin · Ying-Hsuan Lin |
| Submission information | |
|---|---|
| Preprint Link: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.02394v1 (pdf) |
| Date accepted: | Oct. 30, 2020 |
| Date submitted: | May 26, 2020, 2 a.m. |
| Submitted by: | Benjamin, Nathan |
| Submitted to: | SciPost Physics |
| Ontological classification | |
|---|---|
| Academic field: | Physics |
| Specialties: |
|
| Approach: | Theoretical |
Abstract
We revisit the consistency of torus partition functions in (1+1)$d$ fermionic conformal field theories, combining traditional ingredients of modular invariance/covariance with a modernized understanding of bosonization/fermionization dualities. Various lessons can be learned by simply examining the oft-ignored Ramond sector. For several extremal/kinky modular functions in the bootstrap literature, we can either rule out or identify the underlying theory. We also revisit the ${\cal N} = 1$ Maloney-Witten partition function by calculating the spectrum in the Ramond sector, and further extending it to include the modular sum of seed Ramond characters. Finally, we perform the full ${\cal N} = 1$ RNS modular bootstrap and obtain new universal results on the existence of relevant deformations preserving different amounts of supersymmetry.
Published as SciPost Phys. 9, 065 (2020)
Reports on this Submission
Report #2 by Sungjay Lee (Referee 2) on 2020-10-4 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Sungjay Lee, Report on arXiv:2005.02394v1, delivered 2020-10-04, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.2042
Report
Report #1 by Anonymous (Referee 1) on 2020-7-31 (Invited Report)
- Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:2005.02394v1, delivered 2020-07-31, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.1873
Report
The only comment I have is that it may be good to explain what the Arf invariant is, especially in the context of the paper. However, this is not a significant point.
Author: Nathan Benjamin on 2020-08-07 [id 920]
(in reply to Report 1 on 2020-07-31)We thank the referee for the report. We have uploaded a v2 on the arxiv explaining the Arf invariant in Footnote 2 (as well as correcting various typos). (see https://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.02394.pdf)