Loading [MathJax]/extensions/Safe.js
SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

Four no-go theorems on the existence of spin and orbital angular momentum of massless bosons

by Eric Palmerduca, Hong Qin

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Eric Palmerduca
Submission information
Preprint Link: scipost_202412_00011v2  (pdf)
Date submitted: 2025-02-27 23:14
Submitted by: Palmerduca, Eric
Submitted to: SciPost Physics
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
Specialties:
  • Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics - Theory
  • High-Energy Physics - Theory
  • Mathematical Physics
Approach: Theoretical

Abstract

The past decades have seen substantial interest in the so-called orbital angular momentum (OAM) of light, driven largely by its diverse range of applications. However, there are fundamental theoretical issues with decomposing the angular momentum of massless particles, such as photons, into spin (SAM) and orbital angular momentum parts. While the angular momentum of massive particles has a natural splitting into the Wigner SAM and OAM, there are numerous proposed splittings for photons and no consensus about which is correct. Moreover, it has been shown that most of the proposed SAM and OAM operators do not satisfy the defining commutation relations of angular momentum operators and are thus not legitimate splittings. Here, we prove that it is generally impossible to split the total angular momentum operator of massless bosons, such as photons and gravitons, into spin and orbital parts. We prove two further generalizations of this result, showing that there are no SAM-OAM splittings even if (1) the SAM operator generates non-internal symmetries or (2) if one allows the SAM and OAM operators to generate non-SO(3) symmetries.

Author indications on fulfilling journal expectations

  • Provide a novel and synergetic link between different research areas.
  • Open a new pathway in an existing or a new research direction, with clear potential for multi-pronged follow-up work
  • Detail a groundbreaking theoretical/experimental/computational discovery
  • Present a breakthrough on a previously-identified and long-standing research stumbling block

Author comments upon resubmission

We sincerely thank the Editor and the Referees for their time in considering and reviewing our article. We provide a detailed response to each comment in our replies to the Referee Reports, as well as a description of accompanying changes to the manuscript. We have made significant modifications to address many of these comments, especially comment 1 from Referee A which we found particularly interesting. We disagreed with some comments, and in these cases provide a detailed rebuttal. We hope the Referees and Editor find that our replies and the corresponding revisions effectively address all concerns discussed in the comments.
Current status:
In refereeing

Reports on this Submission

Report #2 by Ivan Fernandez Corbaton (Referee 1) on 2025-3-18 (Invited Report)

Report

Dear Prof. Wen:

After the last responses from the authors, I can now recommend the publication of the article.

Best regards
Ivan Fernandez-Corbaton

Recommendation

Publish (surpasses expectations and criteria for this Journal; among top 10%)

  • validity: high
  • significance: top
  • originality: high
  • clarity: high
  • formatting: excellent
  • grammar: excellent

Report #1 by Ivan Fernandez Corbaton (Referee 1) on 2025-3-4 (Invited Report)

Strengths

Please see the attached file: palmerduca_second.pdf

Weaknesses

Please see the attached file: palmerduca_second.pdf

Report

Please see the attached file: palmerduca_second.pdf

Requested changes

Please see the attached file: palmerduca_second.pdf

Attachment


Recommendation

Ask for minor revision

  • validity: high
  • significance: top
  • originality: high
  • clarity: top
  • formatting: excellent
  • grammar: perfect

Author:  Eric Palmerduca  on 2025-03-17  [id 5295]

(in reply to Report 1 by Ivan Fernandez Corbaton on 2025-03-04)

We sincerely thank the Referee for their additional comments and have addressed each in the attached document.

Attachment:

Response_to_Report_1_on_scipost_202412_00011v2.pdf

Login to report or comment