SciPost logo

SciPost Submission Page

The $D_{03}(2380)$ dibaryon resonance excitation in the $pd\to pd\pi\pi$ reaction.

by Nurbek Tursunbayev, Yuriy Uzikov

This Submission thread is now published as

Submission summary

Authors (as registered SciPost users): Nurbek Tursunbayev
Submission information
Preprint Link: scipost_201911_00036v1  (pdf)
Date accepted: 2019-12-10
Date submitted: 2019-11-14 01:00
Submitted by: Tursunbayev, Nurbek
Submitted to: SciPost Physics Proceedings
Proceedings issue: 24th European Few Body Conference (EFB2019)
Ontological classification
Academic field: Physics
  • Nuclear Physics - Theory
Approach: Theoretical


The recent ANKE@COSY data on the differential cross section of reaction $pd \to pd\pi\pi$ demonstrate a peak at invariant mass of the final $d\pi\pi$ system $2.38~GeV$, that corresponds to the isocalar $J^P = 3^+$ dibaryon $D_{03}$, and also enhancement in the distribution over the invariant mass of two final pions. The two-resonance model involving the $t$-channel $\sigma$-meson exchange between the proton and deuteron in the subprocess $pd\to pD_{03}$ and the sequential decays $D_{03}\to D_{12}+\pi$ and $D_{12}\to d +\pi$ was applied to describe the shapes of these distributions with the lowest orbital angular momenta in the corresponding vertices. A possible role of higher orbital momenta in those vertices is studied here.

Published as SciPost Phys. Proc. 3, 056 (2020)

Reports on this Submission

Anonymous Report 1 on 2019-12-6 (Invited Report)

  • Cite as: Anonymous, Report on arXiv:scipost_201911_00036v1, delivered 2019-12-06, doi: 10.21468/SciPost.Report.1376


The paper concerns model calculations of the excitation of dibaryon resonances, extending some previously published work by including higher values of angular momenta in the transition matrix elements. Apart from a small number of minor typos, this article is suitable for publication as a conference proceedings.

Requested changes

1. Re-write the first sentence in the introduction - it is currently too complicated, and does not make sense.

2. page 2, line 24: cocerning -> concerning

3. page 2, line 32: mechanim -> mechanism

4. page 5, line 3: formatting

5. Page 6, table 1: clearer labelling of columns 3 and 4 (they currently have the same heading!)

6. Page 7, figure 4 caption: scatering -> scattering

7. page 7, line 17: tyhe -> the

  • validity: good
  • significance: ok
  • originality: good
  • clarity: -
  • formatting: -
  • grammar: acceptable

Login to report or comment